Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Research - AAA (Abdominal Aortic Aneurism), Cardiac Disease, Treatment, Symptoms, Surgery

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, including details on aaa (abdominal aortic aneurism), cardiac disease, treatment, symptoms, surgery.


Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Books on Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Randomized clinical trial of intraoperative autotransfusion in surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Mercer KG, Spark JI, Berridge DC, Kent PJ, Scott DJ

Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Lincoln Wing, St James's University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative homologous blood transfusion (HBT) is associated with adverse reactions and risks transmission of infection. It has also been implicated as an immunosuppressive agent. Intraoperative autotransfusion (IAT) is a potential method of autologous transfusion. METHODS: This was a single-centre randomized clinical trial of IAT in surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Forty patients were randomized to IAT and 41 underwent surgery with HBT only. Patients in both groups received HBT to maintain haemoglobin levels above 8 g/dl. Transfusion requirements, and incidence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and infection, were compared. RESULTS: Significantly fewer patients in the IAT group required HBT (21 versus 31; P = 0.038) and the median blood requirement per patient was 2 units lower (P = 0.012). There was a higher incidence of chest infection (12 versus four patients; P = 0.049) and SIRS (20 versus nine patients; P = 0.020) in the HBT group. Risk of SIRS was related to aortic cross-clamp time in the IAT group only. CONCLUSION: Use of autotransfusion effectively reduced the need for HBT and was associated with a reduced incidence of postoperative SIRS and infective complications.

Published 1 November 2004 in Br J Surg, 91(11): 1443-8.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2004-2008 Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2004)
  Issue 1 (October)
  Issue 2 (November)
  Issue 3 (December)

Volume 2 (2005)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 5 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)



Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Books

Endoleaks and Endotension: Current Consensus on Their Nature and Significance

Endoleaks and Endotension: Current Consensus on Their Nature and Significance